-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 173
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat: replace pr title validator #526
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #526 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 60.92% 60.92%
=======================================
Files 120 120
Lines 6377 6377
=======================================
Hits 3885 3885
Misses 2120 2120
Partials 372 372 Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Signed-off-by: Xunzhuo <[email protected]>
@ZLBer Any idea on this PR? |
@Xunzhuo Hi, why close it? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
@Xunzhuo Hi, as a poor reader, I didn't find out how to grant access to the TOKEN after reading the doc 😭 |
Signed-off-by: Xunzhuo [email protected]
resolve: #485
What this PR does:
replace pr title validator
compared with thehanimo/pr-title-checker:
amannn/action-semantic-pull-request
is an ideal workflow to check PR Validation, it is followed by semantic style, as forthehanimo/pr-title-checker
, we need to write the pattern in json config, and actually thery are not followed by semantic style tyle, and we have to maintain another json config, which is no-needed.Also this project is more active than hehanimo/pr-title-checker, which means this project is more stable to be maintained. We should choose a stable and active action as our github workflow, otherwise if any bugs happened, we will get into troubles and hard for us to fix, which leads us to change our actions repeatedly, this is not what maintainers want to see.